By Doron Zeilberger
[Appeared in J. of Difference Equations and Applications, v. 17, No. 3, (March 2011) , 375-386]
.pdf
.ps
.tex
Written: March 22, 2009.
Paul Erdos claimed that mathematics is not yet ready to settle the 3x+1 conjecture. I agree, but
very soon it will be! With the exponential growth of computer-generated mathematics, we
(or rather our silicon brethrern) would have a shot at it. Of course, not by number crunching,
but by symbol crunching and automatic deduction. In the present article,
I taught my computer how to use the brilliant ideas of four human beings (Amal Amleh, Ed Grove, Candy Kent, and
Gerry Ladas) to prove two-dimensional analogs of this notorious conjecture.
Once programmed (using my Maple package LADAS)
it reproduced their ten theorems, and generated 134 new ones, complete with proofs. All by itself!
I believe that the proof of the original 3x+1 conjecure would be in the same vein, but one would need a
couple of extra human ideas, and better computers.
Added May 11, 2010: Watch the
movie
(produced by Edinah Gnang)