| Gordon Rebecca Spring 2014, 01:640:152:32 — Calc II Math/Phys (index #12294) Enrollment= 25, Responses= 9 Part A: University-wide Questions: |
Student Responses | Weighted Means | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Disagree 1 |
Strong Agree 5 |
No response |
Section | Course | Level | Dept | ||||
| 1. The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3.89 | 4.31 | 4.35 | 4.33 |
| 2. The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3.67 | 4.27 | 4.26 | 4.26 |
| 3. The instructor generated interest in the course material | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3.78 | 4.08 | 4.12 | 4.09 |
| 4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4.22 | 4.41 | 4.39 | 4.38 |
| 5. The instructor assigned grades fairly | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3.89 | 4.17 | 4.24 | 4.23 |
| 6. The instructional methods encouraged student learning | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3.67 | 4.03 | 4.06 | 4.03 |
| 7. I learned a great deal in this course | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3.11 | 4.10 | 4.05 | 4.07 |
| 8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3.89 | 3.65 | 3.38 | 3.54 |
| Poor | Excellent | |||||||||
| 9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3.56 | 4.04 | 4.07 | 4.06 |
| 10. I rate the overall quality of the course as | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3.44 | 3.89 | 3.90 | 3.93 |
Other comments or suggestions::
When students ask her questions she doesn't really address the question asked. She doesn't want to give the answer away, which is understandable, so she tries to hint at the correct way to figure out the problem. This is okay, however, she poorly does it and it does not help.