| Charnley Matthew Spring 2018, 16:642:574:01 — Numerical Analysis II (index #05056) Enrollment= 21, Responses= 10 Part A: University-wide Questions: |
Student Responses | Weighted Means | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Disagree 1 |
Strong Agree 5 |
No response |
Section | Course | Level | Dept | ||||
| 1. The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 4.80 | 4.90 | 4.76 | 4.77 |
| 2. The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.82 | 4.83 |
| 3. The instructor generated interest in the course material. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 4.80 | 4.89 | 4.70 | 4.71 |
| 4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4.90 | 4.95 | 4.76 | 4.77 |
| 5. The instructor assigned grades fairly. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.78 | 4.78 |
| 6. The instructional methods encouraged student learning. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.73 | 4.73 |
| 7. I learned a great deal in this course. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 4.80 | 4.90 | 4.61 | 4.62 |
| 8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4.90 | 4.90 | 4.66 | 4.67 |
| Poor | Excellent | |||||||||
| 9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4.90 | 4.90 | 4.73 | 4.73 |
| 10. I rate the overall quality of the course as: | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 4.80 | 4.85 | 4.69 | 4.69 |
What do you like best about this course?:
Matt is very nice and his solution is very explicit and easy to understand. He really put a lot of effort to the course
If you were teaching this course, what would you do differently?:
I may be trying to communicate with the professor more and trying to know what professor should expect us to learn and what the exam will look like etc.
Other comments or suggestions::
Matt helps me a lot in the problem sessions.Hope you can tell more about Matlab coding.
| Charnley Matthew Spring 2018, 16:642:575:01 — Numerical Solutions of Partial Differential Equati (index #06743) Enrollment= 19, Responses= 4 Part A: University-wide Questions: |
Student Responses | Weighted Means | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Disagree 1 |
Strong Agree 5 |
No response |
Section | Course | Level | Dept | ||||
| 1. The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4.00 | 4.14 | 4.76 | 4.77 |
| 2. The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.29 | 4.82 | 4.83 |
| 3. The instructor generated interest in the course material. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.29 | 4.70 | 4.71 |
| 4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.14 | 4.76 | 4.77 |
| 5. The instructor assigned grades fairly. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4.25 | 4.14 | 4.78 | 4.78 |
| 6. The instructional methods encouraged student learning. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4.25 | 3.86 | 4.73 | 4.73 |
| 7. I learned a great deal in this course. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4.00 | 3.86 | 4.61 | 4.62 |
| 8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.66 | 4.67 |
| Poor | Excellent | |||||||||
| 9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.29 | 4.73 | 4.73 |
| 10. I rate the overall quality of the course as: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4.25 | 4.00 | 4.69 | 4.69 |
Other comments or suggestions::
For the first half of the semester there seemed to be a bit of a disconnect between teacher and teacher's assistant. Once Matt took over the class it improved, as he knew what was going on in both.