| Charnley Matthew Spring 2015, 01:640:251:22 — Multivariable Calc (index #19841) Enrollment= 26, Responses= 12 Part A: University-wide Questions: |
Student Responses | Weighted Means | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Disagree 1 |
Strong Agree 5 |
No response |
Section | Course | Level | Dept | ||||
| 1. The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 4.33 | 4.47 | 4.46 | 4.37 |
| 2. The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4.42 | 4.42 | 4.36 | 4.29 |
| 3. The instructor generated interest in the course material | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 4.25 | 4.24 | 4.16 | 4.13 |
| 4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4.42 | 4.54 | 4.47 | 4.41 |
| 5. The instructor assigned grades fairly | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 4.42 | 4.32 | 4.35 | 4.24 |
| 6. The instructional methods encouraged student learning | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 4.25 | 4.16 | 4.13 | 4.08 |
| 7. I learned a great deal in this course | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 4.33 | 4.26 | 4.24 | 4.10 |
| 8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 4.08 | 4.03 | 3.94 | 3.62 |
| Poor | Excellent | |||||||||
| 9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4.25 | 4.27 | 4.20 | 4.11 |
| 10. I rate the overall quality of the course as | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 4.17 | 4.14 | 4.14 | 3.99 |
What do you like best about this course?:
Matt has a very upbeat personality and really seems like he enjoy teaching.
The TA.
Professor Charnley was very helpful
I liked the way he taught us it was very easy and i didnt had any difficulty understanding him
If you were teaching this course, what would you do differently?:
Alternate quizzes and maple labs every week. It was like that for a while but then we would have a quiz and lab due the same day.
Nothing.
Nothing
I would do reviews before every exams
In what ways, if any, has this course or the instructor encouraged your intellectual growth and progress?:
Eh.
It has allowd me to study harder
Other comments or suggestions::
Went to office hours ever change I got, learned everything there and nothing in lecture
stop being condescending
Overall this is a very nice class
| Charnley Matthew Spring 2015, 01:640:251:23 — Multivariable Calc (index #19842) Enrollment= 28, Responses= 8 Part A: University-wide Questions: |
Student Responses | Weighted Means | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Disagree 1 |
Strong Agree 5 |
No response |
Section | Course | Level | Dept | ||||
| 1. The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 5.00 | 4.47 | 4.46 | 4.37 |
| 2. The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 5.00 | 4.42 | 4.36 | 4.29 |
| 3. The instructor generated interest in the course material | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.24 | 4.16 | 4.13 |
| 4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 5.00 | 4.54 | 4.47 | 4.41 |
| 5. The instructor assigned grades fairly | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.32 | 4.35 | 4.24 |
| 6. The instructional methods encouraged student learning | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 4.75 | 4.16 | 4.13 | 4.08 |
| 7. I learned a great deal in this course | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.26 | 4.24 | 4.10 |
| 8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 4.63 | 4.03 | 3.94 | 3.62 |
| Poor | Excellent | |||||||||
| 9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 4.88 | 4.27 | 4.20 | 4.11 |
| 10. I rate the overall quality of the course as | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 4.63 | 4.14 | 4.14 | 3.99 |
What do you like best about this course?:
Charnleye xplanation
I liked that it was not an overbearing workload, but it still taught me alot.
Everything
the recitations summarized what was gone over in lecture and presented the material in a different, more to the point way.
I'll love math to my death, and this TA did everything to make sure the students understood
If you were teaching this course, what would you do differently?:
Na
The recitations were a perfect supplement to the lectures, which were sometimes very confusing. Matt usually had a much clearer and organized way of teaching and explaining things.
Nothing, the instructor does a great job at making recitation what it's supposed to be.
Nothing
In what ways, if any, has this course or the instructor encouraged your intellectual growth and progress?:
explanined many diffilcut concepts intuitiveyl in reciation
Taught me how to integrate e^x^2 which was really cool
Further encouraged my mathematics major
Other comments or suggestions::
Na
Great teaching style and super helpful.
Great guy and great instructor!
very helpful, a caring TA and enthusiastic about the material.
Nothing
| Charnley Matthew Spring 2015, 01:640:251:24 — Multivariable Calc (index #19843) Enrollment= 24, Responses= 9 Part A: University-wide Questions: |
Student Responses | Weighted Means | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Disagree 1 |
Strong Agree 5 |
No response |
Section | Course | Level | Dept | ||||
| 1. The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 5.00 | 4.47 | 4.46 | 4.37 |
| 2. The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 5.00 | 4.42 | 4.36 | 4.29 |
| 3. The instructor generated interest in the course material | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 4.67 | 4.24 | 4.16 | 4.13 |
| 4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 4.89 | 4.54 | 4.47 | 4.41 |
| 5. The instructor assigned grades fairly | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 4.89 | 4.32 | 4.35 | 4.24 |
| 6. The instructional methods encouraged student learning | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 4.78 | 4.16 | 4.13 | 4.08 |
| 7. I learned a great deal in this course | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 4.89 | 4.26 | 4.24 | 4.10 |
| 8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 4.78 | 4.03 | 3.94 | 3.62 |
| Poor | Excellent | |||||||||
| 9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 4.78 | 4.27 | 4.20 | 4.11 |
| 10. I rate the overall quality of the course as | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 5.00 | 4.14 | 4.14 | 3.99 |
What do you like best about this course?:
Information was presented in an organized manner, and explanations were clear
the instructor made the material easier to understand
If you were teaching this course, what would you do differently?:
Mr. Charnley is the best TA I've had so far. He always has positive attitude towards his students and is always willing to help. One comment though: Mr. Charnley used the same examples during recitations as professor did which was not that helpful. Other then that, great teacher! Thank you
i would remind students the day before class to have questions ready to ask during class
In what ways, if any, has this course or the instructor encouraged your intellectual growth and progress?:
he has helped me learn to take a complicated concept and break it down into simpler parts
TA Charnley taught us the meaning behind our math, explaining to us the proofs and applications of the theories we learned.
Other comments or suggestions::
Best TA I've ever had. Very helpful.
Thank you so much for a great semester! You made the material so much easier to understand and you made calc 3 as fun as it could possibly be.
you're awesome
Excellent job on part of the TA.
Awesome. Takes time to schedule office hours with students