The largest integer not representable as a distinct sum of values of p(j) fo\ 3 r p(j)=, j , with j>=j0 in at least, C, different ways for j0 from 0 to, 5, and C from 1 to, 5 By Shalosh B. Ekhad The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 0, in at least , 1, different ways is, 12758 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 68921, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 0, in at least , 2, different ways is, 12758 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 68921, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 0, in at least , 3, different ways is, 15278 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 85184, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 0, in at least , 4, different ways is, 15278 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 85184, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 0, in at least , 5, different ways is, 15845 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 91125, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 1, in at least , 1, different ways is, 12758 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 68921, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 1, in at least , 2, different ways is, 15278 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 85184, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 1, in at least , 3, different ways is, 15845 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 91125, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 1, in at least , 4, different ways is, 16061 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 91125, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 1, in at least , 5, different ways is, 16061 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 91125, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 2, in at least , 1, different ways is, 19309 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 117649, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 2, in at least , 2, different ways is, 19309 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 117649, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 2, in at least , 3, different ways is, 23125 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 157464, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 2, in at least , 4, different ways is, 23125 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 157464, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 2, in at least , 5, different ways is, 23125 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 157464, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 3, in at least , 1, different ways is, 23774 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 157464, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 3, in at least , 2, different ways is, 25196 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 175616, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 3, in at least , 3, different ways is, 27437 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 195112, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 3, in at least , 4, different ways is, 27464 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 195112, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 3, in at least , 5, different ways is, 27464 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 195112, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 3 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 4, in at least , 1, different ways is, 26861 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 195112, that we did!