The largest integer not representable as a distinct sum of values of p(j) fo\ 2 r p(j)=, j , with j>=j0 in at least, C, different ways for j0 from 0 to, 5, and C from 1 to, 5 By Shalosh B. Ekhad The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 0, in at least , 1, different ways is, 128 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 625, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 0, in at least , 2, different ways is, 128 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 625, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 0, in at least , 3, different ways is, 132 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 625, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 0, in at least , 4, different ways is, 132 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 625, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 0, in at least , 5, different ways is, 188 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 1225, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 1, in at least , 1, different ways is, 128 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 625, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 1, in at least , 2, different ways is, 132 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 625, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 1, in at least , 3, different ways is, 188 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 1225, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 1, in at least , 4, different ways is, 192 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 1225, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 1, in at least , 5, different ways is, 193 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 1225, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 2, in at least , 1, different ways is, 192 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 1225, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 2, in at least , 2, different ways is, 192 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 1225, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 2, in at least , 3, different ways is, 240 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 1849, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 2, in at least , 4, different ways is, 252 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 2025, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 2, in at least , 5, different ways is, 332 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 3481, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 3, in at least , 1, different ways is, 223 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 1600, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 3, in at least , 2, different ways is, 287 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 2601, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 3, in at least , 3, different ways is, 332 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 3481, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 3, in at least , 4, different ways is, 368 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 4225, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 3, in at least , 5, different ways is, 368 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 4225, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 4, in at least , 1, different ways is, 384 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 4489, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 4, in at least , 2, different ways is, 448 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 6084, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 4, in at least , 3, different ways is, 528 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 8281, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 4, in at least , 4, different ways is, 528 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 8281, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 4, in at least , 5, different ways is, 528 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 8281, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 5, in at least , 1, different ways is, 492 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 7225, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 5, in at least , 2, different ways is, 528 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 8281, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 5, in at least , 3, different ways is, 592 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 10404, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 5, in at least , 4, different ways is, 592 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 10404, that we did! The smallest integer not representable as a sum of distinct values of the po\ 2 lynomial p(j)=, j , with j>=, 5, in at least , 5, different ways is, 597 In order to prove this fact you need to check this for all positive integers\ <=, 10609, that we did!