1 / | 1 On the Irrationality of, | -------- dx, for a from 1 to , 40 | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 a By Shalosh B. Ekhad In this computer-generated book, accompanying the article by Doron Zeilberge\ r and Wadim Zudilin "Towards Automatic Discovery of Irrationailty Proofs and Irrationality Meas\ ures." I will automatically prove irrationality, and establish irrationality measu\ res, for the constant 1 / | 1 | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 a for a from 1 to, 40 I will also state the cases where we were unable to do it. 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | ------ dx | 5 / x + 1 0 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 2 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 3 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 4 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 5 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 6 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 7 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 8 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 9 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.1075967704 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 10 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 11 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 12 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 13 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 14 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.1629529738 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 15 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 16 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 17 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 18 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 19 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.1963894741 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 20 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 21 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 22 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 23 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.001417476473 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 24 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.2815216531 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 25 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.005709844206 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 26 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.01336710794 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 27 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.01947684981 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 28 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.02328678786 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 29 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.2393294020 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 30 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.02921475867 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 31 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.03212734020 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 32 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.03547970100 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 33 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.03827152558 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 34 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.2568568411 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 35 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.04376413892 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 36 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.05234801788 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 37 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.04903733173 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 38 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.05503587845 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 39 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.2693209901 1 / | 1 We are unable, with this method to prove the irrationality of, | -------- dx, | 5 | x / 1 + ---- 0 40 but it seems that a sharperning of the divisibility lemma might lead to a proof since the smallest empirical delta from, 100, to , 200, is positive:, 0.05762730337 ----------------------------------------------- This ends this book that took, 2122.483, seconds to generate.