| URBANSKI CHLOE Summer 2017, 01:640:300:T6 — Math-300: Introduction to Mathematical Reasoning-2 (index #01950) Enrollment= 14, Responses= 6 Part A: University-wide Questions: |
Student Responses | Weighted Means | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Disagree 1 |
Strong Agree 5 |
No response |
Section | Course | Level | Dept | ||||
| 1. The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4.83 | 4.71 | 4.50 | 4.50 |
| 2. The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4.83 | 4.86 | 4.56 | 4.56 |
| 3. The instructor generated interest in the course material | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4.83 | 4.86 | 4.67 | 4.67 |
| 4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.76 | 4.76 |
| 5. The instructor assigned grades fairly | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.58 | 4.58 |
| 6. The instructional methods encouraged student learning | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4.67 | 4.71 | 4.49 | 4.49 |
| 7. I learned a great deal in this course | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4.83 | 4.83 | 4.76 | 4.76 |
| 8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Poor | Excellent | |||||||||
| 9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4.83 | 4.86 | 4.46 | 4.46 |
| 10. I rate the overall quality of the course as | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.48 | 4.48 |