| Urbanski Wawrzyniak Chloe ceu11 Spring 2018, 01:640:311:03 — INTRO REAL ANAL I (index #02537) Enrollment= 18, Responses= 8 Part A: University-wide Questions: |
Student Responses | Weighted Means | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Disagree 1 |
Strong Agree 5 |
No response |
Section | Course | Level | Dept | ||||
| 1. The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 4.63 | 4.56 | 4.55 | 4.38 |
| 2. The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions. | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4.38 | 4.47 | 4.52 | 4.29 |
| 3. The instructor generated interest in the course material. | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.42 | 4.38 | 4.14 |
| 4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 4.75 | 4.64 | 4.61 | 4.37 |
| 5. The instructor assigned grades fairly. | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3.88 | 4.54 | 4.48 | 4.19 |
| 6. The instructional methods encouraged student learning. | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4.38 | 4.42 | 4.35 | 4.09 |
| 7. I learned a great deal in this course. | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4.38 | 4.42 | 4.42 | 4.15 |
| 8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course. | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3.13 | 4.09 | 4.12 | 3.68 |
| Poor | Excellent | |||||||||
| 9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as: | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4.50 | 4.47 | 4.43 | 4.12 |
| 10. I rate the overall quality of the course as: | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4.00 | 4.32 | 4.31 | 4.00 |
What do you like best about this course?:
I loved her friendly and welcoming personality!
Chloe was an amazing teacher and was able to express concepts incredibly well
no
The interactiveness during workshops.
The workshops and quizzes...they adequately supplemented the course content.
If you were teaching this course, what would you do differently?:
I would focus on some of the direct material taught in class so it reinforces concept for the exams.
Nothing! Chloe was great
no
Grade more fairly.
The professor left some gaps during some lectures. Often we were not really sure why we were learning what we were learning or what connections previous topics had with the current topics. There also wasn't a clear transition between chapters (but this is all more geared towards the professor). I would try to communicate more with the professor on what was not covered (and probably should have been).
In what ways, if any, has this course or the instructor encouraged your intellectual growth and progress?:
Always ready to answer questions and help students out.
no
Provided useful advice in learning various concepts and in writing stronger proofs. Although I was wary at first, I am glad that the workshops were done using latex.
Other comments or suggestions::
no
Thanks for all the help and dedication.