| Urbanski Chloe ceu11 Fall 2017, 01:640:421:02 — ADV CALC FOR ENGRNG (index #03448) Enrollment= 64, Responses= 15 Part A: University-wide Questions: |
Student Responses | Weighted Means | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strong Disagree 1 |
Strong Agree 5 |
No response |
Section | Course | Level | Dept | ||||
| 1. The instructor was prepared for class and presented the material in an organized manner. | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3.77 | 4.30 | 4.27 | 4.34 |
| 2. The instructor responded effectively to student comments and questions. | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3.75 | 4.27 | 4.26 | 4.22 |
| 3. The instructor generated interest in the course material. | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 3.77 | 4.08 | 4.10 | 4.05 |
| 4. The instructor had a positive attitude toward assisting all students in understanding course material. | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4.00 | 4.44 | 4.40 | 4.33 |
| 5. The instructor assigned grades fairly. | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3.82 | 4.14 | 4.19 | 4.17 |
| 6. The instructional methods encouraged student learning. | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3.69 | 4.16 | 4.07 | 3.99 |
| 7. I learned a great deal in this course. | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3.92 | 4.12 | 4.11 | 4.02 |
| 8. I had a strong prior interest in the subject matter and wanted to take this course. | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4.00 | 3.91 | 4.05 | 3.61 |
| Poor | Excellent | |||||||||
| 9. I rate the teaching effectiveness of the instructor as: | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3.54 | 4.08 | 4.07 | 4.02 |
| 10. I rate the overall quality of the course as: | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3.85 | 3.99 | 3.99 | 3.90 |
What do you like best about this course?:
The TA knows nothing about the course materials. She is not able to answer our questions when we asked her.
Simplicity of the material for the 1st exam
The professor made learning this subject not too difficult
Learning the applications of the concepts
I like the pace of the course and how much time is spent on each topic.
The teaching assistant for this course explained everything even better than the professor did!
Availability of chloe.
If you were teaching this course, what would you do differently?:
I would do more examples when the students asked me questions.
Add a recitation
I wouldn't have 60 percent of our grade be dependent on just the final
Had some issues contacting TA, stopped answering emails and was canceling office hours while still unresponsive on email. Made it hard to get help for the class
I did not like that there was no physical recitation and just recitation videos posted.
I would hold more review sessions with the TA, as she explained the material in a way that really helped me understand it.
Give more exams or room for credit
Nothing
In what ways, if any, has this course or the instructor encouraged your intellectual growth and progress?:
Not at all.
I've always liked math, this just reinforced it a little more
n/a
I only went to one of her review sessions, the one before the midterm, and I am planning on going to the one before the final. She was very organized, and she explained things very clearly.
none
Other comments or suggestions::
N/A
I didn't attend her office hours and there were no recitations so I don't feel like I can accurately rate her at all
if he were a little more easy about partial credit it would be nice considering 90 percent of our grade depends on just two exams
Thank you for clarifying so much in this course!